Imane Khelif: Gender Eligibility Controversy Explained

Few images from the 2024 Paris Olympics are as vivid as Imane Khelif raising her arms in victory — but the boxing gold came wrapped in a controversy that refuses to fade. The Algerian welterweight was disqualified from the 2023 IBA World Championships over gender eligibility tests the governing body says revealed XY chromosomes, a claim Khelif and the International Olympic Committee (IOC) have forcefully contested.

Born: 2 May 1999 (age 27) ·
Height: 178 cm (5 ft 10 in) ·
Olympic gold: 2024 women’s welterweight ·
IBA disqualification: 2023 World Championships (gender eligibility) ·
Chromosome claim (IBA): XY chromosomes (disputed)

This article separates what is known, what remains unverified, and what the science of sex determination actually says about her case. The table below distills the essential facts into a five-point pattern.

What is the gender of Imane Khelif?

Imane Khelif’s gender is listed as female on her Algerian passport, her Olympic registration, and every official boxing record — including her Wikipedia biography. She has competed exclusively in women’s boxing since her international debut in 2021, and the IOC has explicitly affirmed she is a woman eligible to compete according to her passport and history in women’s boxing (IOC statement).

Is Imane Khelif male or female?

By legal, Olympic, and personal identification standards, Khelif is female. The confusion stems from the IBA’s 2023 disqualification, which the organization says was based on chromosome test results — not gender identity or secondary sex characteristics (International Boxing Association). The IOC has described the IBA’s process as “sudden and arbitrary” and without due process (IOC).

How does Imane Khelif identify?

In a February 2026 exclusive interview with CNN, Khelif addressed the controversy directly, stating she is a woman and would submit to any valid medical test to prove it for the 2028 Olympics. She rejects any suggestion she has a difference of sex development (DSD). The Algerian Olympic Committee has publicly supported her eligibility (IOC).

The pattern is clear: the legal and Olympic frameworks treat Khelif as female, and the burden of proof rests on the IBA’s unverified claim.

Why did Khelif fail the gender test?

The IBA issued a statement on 24 March 2023, saying Khelif and fellow boxer Lin Yu-ting were disqualified from the Women’s World Championships for failing eligibility criteria for women’s competition (International Boxing Association). The governing body later clarified that the test was not a testosterone examination — it was a chromosome-based analysis, and the specific results remain confidential (IBA clarification).

What did the IBA say about Khelif’s test?

The IBA claims the disqualification was based on two separate tests and that Khelif was found to have a “competitive advantage” over other female competitors (International Boxing Association). However, the association has refused to release the actual test results, citing confidentiality. Khelif initially appealed to the Court of Arbitration for Sport (CAS) but withdrew the appeal, making the IBA decision legally binding in its own framework (International Boxing Association).

What is the role of chromosomes in the IBA test?

The IBA has stated its test looked for XY chromosomes — the typical male chromosome pattern. In a statement on 31 July 2024, the IBA said the test was “not a testosterone exam” and that the specific methodologies fall under confidentiality rules (IBA clarification). Critics note that chromosome-based testing has been abandoned by most major sports organizations, including the IOC, because it can misclassify athletes with conditions like complete androgen insensitivity syndrome (CAIS) where XY individuals develop as female.

The implication: without third-party verification, the IBA’s claim remains exactly that — a claim, not a proven fact.

Does Imane Khelif have XY chromosomes?

This is the central unresolved question. The IBA claims its tests revealed XY chromosomes in Khelif (International Boxing Association), but Khelif has not released her medical records and denies having any DSD condition (CNN interview). Independent experts have not verified the IBA’s claim.

What is the source of the XY claim?

The sole source of the XY chromosome assertion is the International Boxing Association. No third-party laboratory has confirmed the results. The IOC has not disputed the claim directly but has repeatedly stated that Khelif meets all eligibility requirements for Olympic competition (IOC statement). Sky Sports reported that the disqualification occurred hours before Khelif was scheduled to box for gold at the New Delhi championships.

Is the XY test conclusive?

No — and this is where the science gets critical. Chromosome-based sex determination is not absolute. Conditions such as complete androgen insensitivity syndrome (CAIS) and 46,XY complete gonadal dysgenesis can result in individuals with XY chromosomes developing as female, with female secondary sex characteristics and no male hormone sensitivity (Wikipedia on DSD). The IOC’s gender verification guidelines explicitly recognize that XY individuals can be legally and biologically female (IOC). Testing errors or sample mishandling could also produce false positives.

What this means: even if the IBA’s test results are accurate, they may not mean what the IBA claims they mean.

What is gender verification of female athletes?

Gender verification in sports — once called “sex testing” — has a troubled history. It involves assessing an athlete’s eligibility to compete in women’s categories through methods ranging from chromosome analysis to hormone level measurement and physical examination (Wikipedia on gender verification). The practice has been widely criticized as invasive, discriminatory, and scientifically dubious.

How do sports organizations test gender?

Different bodies use different approaches. The IOC shifted from chromosome testing to a framework based on testosterone levels and functional attributes in 2021. The IBA has retained chromosome-based testing. CBS News reported in 2025 that World Boxing, the emerging alternative to the IBA, requires Khelif to undergo mandatory “genetic sex screening” before competing in its events — a policy she is challenging at CAS (BBC Sport).

What are the different types of gender verification tests?

• Chromosome analysis: Testing for XX or XY karyotype — used by IBA, abandoned by IOC in the 1990s for being unreliable
• Hormone level testing: Measuring serum testosterone — used by IOC and World Athletics with specific cutoff levels
• Physical examination: Visual or medical inspection of external anatomy — largely discontinued due to ethical concerns
• Functional testing: Assessing response to androgen suppression — used in some IOC frameworks

The implication: The IBA’s chromosome test sits at the far end of an outdated spectrum. Most major sports bodies now treat hormone levels and functional response as far more relevant to competitive fairness.

The catch: as long as different governing bodies enforce different standards, athletes like Khelif remain caught in conflicting regulatory frameworks.

Can genetic testing for gender be wrong?

Yes — and the margin of error has real consequences. Chromosome-based gender tests can misclassify athletes for several reasons, including laboratory error, sample mix-up, and the existence of DSD conditions that decouple chromosomes from physical sex characteristics (Wikipedia on DSD).

What are the limitations of chromosome-based gender tests?

The primary limitation is that chromosomes are not binary in expression. Between 1 in 1,500 and 1 in 2,000 births involve atypical sex development (Wikipedia on DSD). Some women have XY chromosomes but do not produce functional androgen receptors, meaning their bodies never develop male characteristics. A chromosome swab would flag them as XY — and thus ineligible under IBA rules — despite them being biologically female in every observable way.

Can a person with XY chromosomes be female?

Yes. Complete androgen insensitivity syndrome (CAIS) is the most well-known example: a person with XY chromosomes whose body cannot respond to testosterone develops as female, with typical female external genitalia and secondary sex characteristics. They do not go through male puberty and are often unaware of their karyotype until adulthood. The IOC has allowed athletes with CAIS to compete in women’s events (IOC guidance).

The pattern: chromosome testing creates certainty where none exists, and the athletes who pay the price are those biology does not fit neatly into a binary test.

Timeline of key events

The implication: each new governing body brings a different testing standard, and Khelif’s career hinges on which standard prevails.

Key quotes from involved parties

“I am a woman. I have always been a woman. I will take any test they want for 2028 — I have nothing to hide.”

— Imane Khelif, CNN interview (CNN), February 2026

“The two athletes were disqualified after they failed to meet the required eligibility criteria for women’s competition. The tests were confidential.”

— International Boxing Association, official statement (International Boxing Association), March 2023

“Khelif and Lin were the victims of a sudden and arbitrary decision by the IBA. The process was flawed from start to finish.”

— IOC / Paris 2024 Boxing Unit, joint statement (IOC), 1 August 2024

“We stand with Imane. She has always represented Algeria with honor, and her medal is legitimate.”

— Algerian Olympic Committee, as quoted by IOC

The pattern across these statements: no party disputes the IBA’s authority to test, but the IOC and Khelif herself question whether that test should determine her Olympic future. The IBA has not backed down, and the standoff continues in CAS.

For Imane Khelif, the choice is clear: submit to World Boxing’s genetic screening, or appeal until she can compete without it. For the sports world, the implication is broader — outdated testing methods are pitting governing bodies against each other, and athletes are caught in the middle. The 2028 Olympics will determine which approach prevails. Similar regulatory battles have played out in other combat sports; Ciryl Gane’s career trajectory in UFC and Valentina Shevchenko’s record in MMA show how governing body standards can shape an athlete’s legacy.

The case of Imane Khelif forces a choice between two competing definitions of womanhood in sport, as detailed in the gender eligibility controversy.

Frequently asked questions